|
SCOPE
This policy applies to faculty, staff and students in all offices and
divisions of GallaudetUniversity.
POLICY
Sexual harassment is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, as amended. The University is committed to providing an environment
that is free of unlawful sexual harassment and does not condone sexual
harassment in any form. Reports of sexual harassment are investigated
thoroughly, promptly and objectively.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines define
sexual harassment as follows:
"Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other
verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment
when:
- submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly
a term orcondition of an individual's employment;
- submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used
as the basis foremployment decisions affecting that individual; or
- such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering
with anindividual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile,
or offensiveworking environment."
All levels of management are accountable for the implementation of the
Sexual Harassment and Consensual Relationships procedure appended to this
policy. Any employee or student who is guilty of or responsible for acts
of sexual harassment is subject to appropriate disciplinary action.
Incidents of sexual harassment or sexual misconduct related to minors
will be governed by Pre-College policies and procedures and/or by District
of Columbia code.
- SEXUAL HARASSMENT
- Rationale
- Sexual harassment is a form, either direct or indirect of
sexualdiscrimination and will not be tolerated by the University.
It subverts themission of the University and threatens the careers,
educational experience,and well-being of students, faculty and
staff. Relationships involvingsexual harassment or discrimination
have no place within the University. In both obvious and subtle
ways, the very possibility of sexual harassmentis destructive
to individual students, faculty, staff, and the academiccommunity
as a whole. When, through fear or reprisal, a student, facultyor
staff members submits or is pressured to submit to unwanted
sexualattention, the University's ability to carry out its mission
is undermined.
- Sexual harassment is especially serious when it threatens
relationshipsbetween teacher and student or supervisor and subordinate.
In suchsituations, sexual harassment exploits unfairly the power
inherent in afaculty member's or supervisor's position. Through
grades, wageincreases, recommendations for graduate study, promotion,
and the like, ateacher or supervisor can have a decisive influence
on a student's or facultyor staff member's career at the University
and beyond.
- While sexual harassment most often takes place in situations
of powerdifferential between the persons involved, the University
also recognizesthat sexual harassment may occur between persons
of the same Universitystatus. The University does not tolerate
behavior between or amongmembers of the University community
that create an unacceptableworking or educational environment.
- Prohibited Acts
No member of the University community may engage in sexual harassment.
Forthe purpose of this policy, sexual harassment is defined as
unwelcome advances,requests for sexual favors, or other verbal
or physical conduct of a sexual naturewhen:
- submission to such conduct is made explicitly a term or condition
of anindividual's employment or status in a course, program
or activity;
- submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual
is used as abasis for an employment or educational decision
affecting that individual; or
- such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering
with an individual'swork or educational performance or of creating
an intimidating, hostile oroffensive working or learning environment.
- Examples of Sexual Harassment
- Direct or implied threats that include all forms of communication
(verbal, nonverbal,signed, written, and physical).
- Direct or indirect propositions.
- Subtle pressure for sexual activity, an element of which may
be conductsuch as repeated and unwanted staring.
- A pattern of conduct (not legitimately related to the subject
matter of acourse in which one is involved) intended to discomfort
or humiliate areasonable person that includes one or more of
the following: (a) commentsof a sexual nature; (b) sexually
explicit statements, questions, jokes, oranecdotes; (c) unnecessary
stalking, including repeated unwarrantedappearances anywhere
on campus; (d) remarks of a sexual nature about a person's clothing
or body; (e) remarks about sexual activity orspeculations about
sexual experiences; (f) physical touches of a sexualnature;
(g) sexual pictures, calendars, graffiti, or objects; (h) offensivelanguage
or gestures.
- Isolated and Inadvertent Offenses
Members of the University community who, without establishing
a pattern ofdoing so, engage in isolated conduct of the kind described
in C4 or who exhibit apattern of engaging in such conduct but
fail to realize that their actions discomfortor humiliate, demonstrate
an insensitivity that warrants remedial measures. Whensuch activities
occur, all members of the campus community have a responsibility,especially
within their peer group, to point out the offense.
- CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS
- Definition
The terms faculty and faculty member, as used in this section
in the instructionalcontext, mean all those who teach at the University
including staff, graduatestudents with teaching responsibilities,
and other instructional personnel.
- Rationale
- The University's educational mission is promoted by professionalism
infaculty/staff-student relationships. Professionalism is fostered
by anatmosphere of mutual trust and respect; it is incumbent
upon faculty andstaff members to foster a spirit of academic
and personal integrity at alltimes. Actions of faculty or staff
members and students that harm thisatmosphere undermine professionalism
and hinder fulfillment of theUniversity's educational mission.
Trust and respect are diminished whenthose in positions of authority
abuse or appear to abuse their power. Those who abuse or appear
to abuse their power in such a context violatetheir duty to
the University community.
- Faculty members exercise power over students, whether in giving
thempraise or criticism, evaluating them, making recommendations
to further theirstudies or their future employment, or conferring
any otherbenefits on them. Amorous relationships between faculty
and students arewrong when the faculty member has professional
responsibility for thestudent. Such situations greatly increase
the chances that the facultymember will abuse his/her power
and sexually exploit the student. Voluntary consent by the student
in such a relationship is suspect, giventhe fundamentally unequal
nature of the relationship. Moreover, otherstudents and faculty
may be affected by such unprofessional behaviorbecause it places
the faulty member in a position to favor or advance onestudent's
interest at the expense of others and suggests that obtainingbenefits
may be contingent on amorous or sexual favors. Therefore, theUniversity
views it as unethical if faculty members engage in amorousrelationships
with students who are enrolled in their classes or subject totheir
supervision, even when both parties appear to have consented
to therelationship.
- Consensual Relationship in the Instructional Context
No faculty member may have an amorous relationship (consensual
or otherwise)with a student who is enrolled in a course being
taught by the faculty memberwhose academic work (including work
as a teaching assistant) is being supervisedby the faculty member.
- Consensual Relationship Outside of the Instructional Context
Amorous relationships between faculty or staff members and students
occurring outside the instructional context may lead to difficulties.
Particularly when the faculty or staffmember and student are in
the same academic unit or in units that areacademically allied,
relationships and the parties view as consensual may appear toothers
to be exploitive. Further, in such situations (and others that
cannot beanticipated), the faculty or staff member may face serious
conflicts of interestand should be careful to distance himself/herself
from any decisions that mayreward or penalize the students involved.
A faculty or staff member who fails towithdraw from participation
in activities or decisions that may reward or penalize a student
with whom the faculty or staff member has or has had an amorous
relationshipwill be deemed to have violated his/her ethical obligation
to the student, to otherstudents, to colleagues, and to the University.
- Violations
Alleged violations of Section II may be filed by any person,
or the process maybe initiated by the appropriate administrative
officer.
- SEXUAL HARASSMENT PROCEDURES
- Informal Complaint
- Employees or University students who wish the matter to be
handledinformally should contact the employee's unit administrator,administrative
officer, the EEO officer (Special Assistant to the Presidentfor
Diversity and Community Relations) or the Director of HumanResources,
preferably within 10 working days of the incident. Universitystudents
should also consult with appropriate student support personnelfor
advice and counseling. Students who have a complaint against
anotherstudent should contact the Director of Judicial affairs.
- The person to whom the complaint is brought will, within 10
workingdays (unless there are extenuating circumstances) and
without directlyaccusing and without divulging the name of the
accuser (unless authorizedby the complainant), counsel the employee
or student and caution him/herabout offensive and inappropriate
behaviors and actions or will take otherappropriate action to
resolve the complaint informally (e.g., removeoffensive pictures).
- Formal Complaint
- An employee or University student who wishes the matter to
receive aformal investigation and review should contact the
EEO officer (SpecialAssistant to the President for Diversity
and Community Relations).Students who wish to make a formal
complaint against another studentshould contact the Director
of Judicial Affairs.
- The EEO officer, in consultation with the appropriate administrativeofficer,
or the Director of Judicial Affairs, will determine the method
bywhich the investigation will be conducted. The purpose of
theinvestigation is to establish whether there is a reasonable
basis for believingthat an alleged violation of this policy
has occurred. In conducting theinvestigation, the EEO officer
and/or the appropriate administrative officer(or his/her designee)
or the Director of Judicial Affairs may interview thecomplainant,
the accused, and other persons believed to have pertinentfactual
knowledge. At all times, the administrator conducting theinvestigation
will take steps to ensure confidentiality.
- The investigation will afford the accused a full opportunity
to respond tothe allegations.
- Possible outcomes of the investigation are: (a) a judgment
that theallegations are not warranted; (b) a negotiated settlement
of the complaint;or (c) formal disciplinary action.
- Protection of Complainant and Others
- Formal investigations of complaints will be initiated only
with thecomplainant's consent. The complainant will be informed
fully of stepstaken during the investigation.
- All reasonable action will be taken to assure that the complainant
andthose testifying on behalf of the complainant or supporting
thecomplainant in other ways will suffer no retaliation as a
result of theiractivities in regard to the process. Steps to
avoid retaliation may include:(a) lateral transfers of one or
more of the parties in an employment settingand a comparable
move if a classroom setting is involved; and (b)arrangements
that academic and/or employment evaluations concerning thecomplainant
or others be made by the appropriate individual otherthan the
accused.
- In extraordinary circumstances, the administrative officer
may suspend afaculty or staff member or teaching assistant accused
of sexual harassmentuntil the matter is resolved.
- Protection of the Accused
- At the time a formal complaint is issued, the accused will
be informed ofthe allegations, the identity of the complainant,
and the facts surroundingthe allegations.
- In the event the allegations are not substantiated, all reasonable
steps willbe taken to restore the reputation of the accused
if it was damaged by theproceeding.
- A complainant found to have been intentionally dishonest in
making theallegations or to have made them maliciously will
be subject to disciplinaryaction.
- Protecting Both Parties
- To the extent possible, formal proceedings will be conducted
in a way toprotect the confidentiality interests of both parties.
- After the investigation, the parties will be informed of the
facts developedin the course of the investigation.
- The parties will be informed promptly of the outcome of the
proceedings.
- Process of Taking Formal Disciplinary Action
- If, after the investigation, there is a reasonable basis for
believing that analleged violation of this policy has occurred
and a negotiated settlementcannot be reached, formal disciplinary
action may be taken.
- The decision to take formal disciplinary action will be made
by theappropriate administrative officer.
- Formal Disciplinary Action
Formal disciplinary action may range from a reprimand to termination
ofemployment. Except as specifically modified by other provisions
of this policy,formal action involving allegations of:
- Violations of this policy and any appeals by faculty members
(notincluding teaching assistants or staff) will be governed
by Universityfaculty guidelines and by-laws. Upon motion from
one of the partiesmade before the start of the hearing process,
the hearing panel will close allor part of any hearing held
under this policy. Upon motion from one ofthe parties after
the hearing has started or from some other interestedparty,
the hearing panel may close all or part of the hearing held
under thisprocedure.
- Violations of this policy by staff members will be processed
by theappropriate administrative officer or his/her designee
and may be appealedthrough the dispute resolution procedure.
- Violations of this policy by students will be governed by
the studentjudicial program.
- Preparation and Dissemination of Information
The EEO officer (Special Assistant to the President for Diversity
and CommunityRelations) will ensure that this policy is available
to all members of the campuscommunity and to all those who join
the community in the future. An annualletter will be sent to all
faculty and staff to remind them of the contents of thispolicy.
Copies of this policy will be available at appropriate offices.
Additionally, the EEO officer (Special Assistant to the President
for Diversityand Community Relations) will offer training sessions
for persons who are likelyto receive complaints that this policy
has been violated.
- SEXUAL MISCONDUCT
For the purpose of this policy, sexual misconduct includes, but is
not necessarily limitedto, sexual contact without consent or against
the will of the alleged victim including forcedviewing, unwanted touching,
rape, sodomy and penetration with objects.
The University's primary concern with respect to any incident of
sexual misconduct isthe safety and well-being of the victim. Should
any incident of sexual misconduct occur,faculty and staff are encouraged
to go to a place where they are in no immediate dangerand to seek
medical attention if needed. Faculty or staff may contact the Department
ofSafety and Security for assistance. Reports of sexual misconduct
should be reported tothe Department of Safety and Security as soon
as possible. The Department of Safetyand Security will work with the
EEO officer and the appropriate administrative officer asdescribed
in Section III above in addressing a formal complaint.
Detailed procedures for University students for reporting sexual
misconduct are availablefrom student support offices.
Note: This document is based on the sexual harassment policy of the
University of Iowa. It is reprinted here, in whole and in part, with the
permission of the University of Iowa.
|